MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008646490 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2010.5575152

Propeller dynamometer for small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

2010· article· en· W2008646490 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Raju Hossain, Nicholas Krouglicof

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDynamometerPropellerStrain gaugeThrustCalibrationTorqueSensitivity (control systems)Marine engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringFull scaleScale (ratio)Aerospace engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringElectronic engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper details the design and development of a small scale air propeller dynamometer based on thin beam strain gauge load cells. The dynamometer will be used to characterize the performances of small propellers for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in order to obtain an accurate system model and design an appropriate controller for hovering and smooth flight. A brief description of the design concept and calibration procedure along with test results is presented here. A static calibration was performed to determine thrust/torque measurement sensitivity as well as cross-sensitivity. Measurement data was captured and processed using a sigma-delta data acquisition board. Test results confirm that the dynamometer can be used to reliably measure thrust and torque produced by UAV propellers up to 10 inch in diameter with an accuracy of ±1% of full scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207