MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008647334 · doi:10.1002/jcd.20171

Super‐simple holey Steiner pentagon systems and related designs

2007· article· en· W2008647334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Designs · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersBeijing Institute For Brain Disorders
KeywordsPentagonSimple (philosophy)MathematicsCombinatoricsType (biology)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A Steiner pentagon system of order v (SPS( v )) is said to be super‐simple if its underlying ( v , 5, 2)‐BIBD is super‐simple; that is, any two blocks of the BIBD intersect in at most two points. It is well known that the existence of a holey Steiner pentagon system (HSPS) of type T implies the existence of a (5, 2)‐GDD of type T. We shall call an HSPS of type T super‐simple if its underlying (5, 2)‐GDD of type T is super‐simple; that is, any two blocks of the GDD intersect in at most two points. The existence of HSPSs of uniform type h n has previously been investigated by the authors and others. In this article, we focus our attention on the existence of super‐simple HSPSs of uniform type h n . © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 16: 301–328, 2008

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it