MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008680742 · doi:10.1086/517621

The Large Zenith Telescope: A 6 m Liquid‐Mirror Telescope

2007· article· en· W2008680742 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Hickson, Thomas Pfrommer, R. Cabanac, Arlin Crotts, Ben A. Johnson, V. de Lapparent, Kenneth M. Lanzetta, Stefan Gromoll, M. Mulrooney, Suresh Sivanandam, Bruce E. Truax

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelescopeOptical telescopeZenithPrimary mirrorPhysicsOpticsRemote sensingPixelAstronomyReflecting telescopeAperture (computer memory)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Large Zenith Telescope is a 6 m optical telescope employing a rotating primary mirror coated with a film of liquid mercury. Located at an altitude of 400 m in the Coast Mountains of southwestern British Columbia, this telescope began regular operation in 2005 October. Equipped with a four‐element Richardson prime‐focus corrector and thinned 2048 × 2048 pixel drift‐scanning CCD imaging camera, it is used for astronomical survey observations and also serves as an engineering test facility for further development of liquid‐mirror technology. Built at a cost of less than $1 million dollars, it achieves an image quality and sensitivity comparable to that of a conventional telescope of equal aperture and is limited primarily by the astronomical quality of the site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207