MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008683773 · doi:10.1017/s0022112004001752

Visco-plastic fluid displacements in near-vertical narrow eccentric annuli: prediction of travelling-wave solutions and interfacial instability

2004· article· en· W2008683773 on OpenAlexaff
S. Pelipenko, I.A. Frigaard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)MechanicsInstabilityLaminar flowBuoyancyDisplacement (psychology)ScalingPhysicsViscosityClassical mechanicsGeologyMaterials scienceMathematicsGeometryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present new results on the laminar displacement of Herschel–Bulkley fluids along narrow eccentric annuli. We adopt a Hele-Shaw modelling approach and consider the possibility that a long displacement finger should advance along the wide side of the annulus. We deduce conditions under which this cannot happen. We also analyse local instability of the interface on wide and narrow sides of the annulus using the Muskat approach. We thus show that it is possible to have both steady and unsteady travelling-wave solutions, for which the interface is locally stable. We show how steady stable displacements arise from an increase in effective viscosity difference between displacing and displaced fluids and also analyse effects of buoyancy on the displacement. As opposed to many studies of Hele-Shaw displacements, the principle focus is on identifying stable steady displacements. Finally, we show how predictions of our model, derived from the Navier–Stokes equations using well-defined scaling arguments, compare with some of the ad hoc rule-based design systems that are currently used in the oil industry for design of primary cementing displacements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207