Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente contribution s’inscrit dans l’axe des rapports qu’entretiennent les langues existantes dans l’aire géographique marocaine. Elle porte essentiellement sur l’un des aspects du conflit linguistique que nous appelons : le conflit onomastique en l’occurrence le conflit toponymique, une part cachée du conflit des langues. Alors pour comprendre ce conflit toponymique au Maroc, il importe de croiser les regards : linguistique, sociolinguistique, géographique, sociologique… Au cours de nos enquêtes sur l’onomastique amazighe, nous avons pratiquement assisté à ce conflit sur lequel nous avons collecté des données par la méthode qualitative, l’observation directe et l’analyse de contenu. L’objectif de la présente communication est de mettre en lumière ce conflit toponymique au Maroc, d’en dresser linguistiquement les aspects majeurs : transcription, substitution, traduction, dénaturalisation, valorisation et étymologisation tendancieuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it