MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008699067 · doi:10.3917/rhu.026.0005

Le quartier artistique, un objet pour l'histoire urbaine

2010· article· fr· W2008699067 on OpenAlexaff
Mélanie Traversier

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire urbaine · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Me ´lanie TraversierLe quartier artistique, un objet pour l'histoire urbaine 1 H.U. n o 26 -octobre 2009 -p. 5 a `20 2. Le « quartier litte ´raire », moins aise ´ment perceptible, faute de marqueurs urbains suffisamment tangibles, fait partie plus marginalement de l'objet d'e ´tude.Cela n'exclut pas d'e ´voquer les maisons d'e ´crivains ou la pre ´sence des auteurs et des e ´diteurs de `s lors qu'ils s'agre `gent ou participent a `un quartier artistique constitue ´.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire urbaineSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207