Impact of Globalisation on Corporate Governance in Developing Economies: A Theoretical Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The key elements in globalization are the interconnection of sovereign nations through trade and capital flows, harmonization of the economic rules, creation of structural support and facilitate interconnection and the development of a global market, which allow flow of foreign investment, both direct and portfolio. To assure these corporate financiers that their investment would be secured, there is need for good corporate governance, which involves a network of relationships between corporate managers, directors and the stakeholders. The objective of this paper is to find out how globalization has been able to influence corporate governance practices in developing economies. Findings indicate that corporate governance in most developing economies has been influenced by globalization, which has provided an international benchmark for policy makers on issue of corporate governance. Based on the findings, recommendations were made on how to improve corporate governance in developing countries, especially Nigeria. JEL Classification: G38
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it