Diphenyl carbazide restores electron transport in isolated, illuminated chloroplasts after electron transport from water has been eliminated by mild heat treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freshly isolated, illuminated chloroplasts oxidize water and transfer the resulting electrons through the photosynthetic electron transport chains in their thylakoid membranes to the artificial electron acceptor, dichlorophenol indophenol (DCPIP). As a consequence, DCPIP is reduced and the decline in absorbance over time can be used to measure the rate of electron transfer. When gently heated, chloroplasts lose the capacity to oxidize water and the transfer of electrons to DCPIP is eliminated. Electron transport through chloroplasts to DCPIP is restored in the presence of the artificial electron donor diphenylcarbazide (DPC). If students gain experience with the DCPIP photoreduction assay and are given information on normal chloroplast function, they should be able to predict the behavior of heat-treated chloroplasts in a variety of experimental conditions. A number of such predictions are outlined and tested. The experiments can all be conducted with a limited repertoire of equipment and easily prepared solutions. Consequently, this work is well suited to an investigative study in which each student group, in consultation with instructors, can make and test its own prediction. The ways in which changing different variables can affect the quality of the experimental results is emphasized. Additional studies, on measurements of rates of oxygen evolution and emitted chlorophyll fluorescence, are briefly described to support the inferences that heat-treated chloroplasts do not oxidize water and that the vectorial transfer of electrons through them to DCPIP is identical to that in untreated chloroplasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".