MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008736071 · doi:10.3828/qs.42.1.91

The Legal Geography of Water Exports: A Case Study of the Transboundary Municipal Water Supplies Between Stanstead (Québec) and Derby Line (Vermont)

2006· article· en· W2008736071 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueQuebec Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine (geometry)GeographyWater resource managementRegional sciencePolitical scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours des dernieres annees, les gouvernements federal et provinciaux ont adopte des mesures legislatives afin de restreindre et d'empecher l'exportation d'eau a l'exterieur du Canada en reponse aux protestations formulees par la societe civile et les milieux academiques. Bien que la litterature scientifique portant sur ce theme soit volumineuse, aucun article n'a jusqu'a ce jour aborde les approvisionnements transfrontaliers entre municipalites situees le long de la frontiere canado-americaine. L'objectif premier de la recherche est de mettre en valeur l'un de ces echanges a partir d'une etude de cas de la dyade Stanstead (Quebec) et Derby Line (Vermont). L'article debute avec une revue de la litterature portant sur l'interface geo-legale, suivi d'un survol du contexte socio-politique dans lequel s'insere ces echanges transfrontaliers. L'analyse porte ensuite sur les strategies geo-legales mises en place par ces communautes en ce qui a trait au partage de la ressource hydrique. En conclusion, il est so...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuebec StudiesSame topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207