MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008736468 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.045806

Improving the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>,γ)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>rate in oxygen-neon novae: Constraints on<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>values for proton-threshold states in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2011· article· lv· W2008736468 on OpenAlexaff
A. Parikh, K. Wimmer, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, J. José, R. Longland, H.‐F. Wirth, V. Bildstein, S. Bishop, A. A. Chen, J. A. Clark, C. M. Deibel, C. Herlitzius, R. Krücken, D. Seiler, Karl D. Straub, C. Wrede

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysicsOrder (exchange)Atomic physicsDipoleProtonNucleosynthesisNuclear reactionNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calculation of the thermonuclear $^{30}\mathrm{P}$($p$,\ensuremath{\gamma})$^{31}\mathrm{S}$ rate in oxygen-neon nova explosions depends critically upon nuclear structure information for states within \ensuremath{\sim}600 keV of the ${}^{30}\mathrm{P}+p$ threshold in $^{31}\mathrm{S}$. We have studied the $^{31}\mathrm{P}$(${}^{3}\mathrm{He},t$)$^{31}\mathrm{S}$ reaction at 25 MeV using a high-resolution quadrupole-dipole-dipole-dipole magnetic spectrograph. Tritons corresponding to the states ${E}_{x}$($^{31}\mathrm{S}$) \ensuremath{\sim} 6.1--7.1 MeV were observed at ten angles between ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathrm{lab}}$ $=$ 10\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} and 55\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}. States that were only tentatively identified in past studies have been observed unambiguously. For the first time, we have measured and analyzed angular distributions of the $^{31}\mathrm{P}$(${}^{3}\mathrm{He},t$)$^{31}\mathrm{S}$ reaction. We present, also for the first time, a consistent set of experimental spin constraints for all except one of the critical proton-threshold states in $^{31}\mathrm{S}$. Hydrodynamic nova simulations have been calculated in order to assess the impact on nova nucleosynthesis of remaining uncertainties in ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}$ values of $^{31}\mathrm{S}$ states and the unknown relevant proton spectroscopic factors. We find that these uncertainties may lead to a factor of up to 20 variation in the $^{30}\mathrm{P}$($p$,\ensuremath{\gamma})$^{31}\mathrm{S}$ rate over typical nova peak temperatures, which may then lead to a factor of up to 4 variation in the nova yields of Si-Ar isotopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.011
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0130.014
Research integrity0.0100.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207