Deriving emission credits from energy efficiency projects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary form only given. In 1997, the Ontario Power Generation emission-trading program identified the potential to create emission credits from energy efficiency savings-providing that there was a decrease in fossil emissions. Emission trading provides an economic incentive-of about 0.5 c/kWh to eligible energy efficiency projects. These credits are then used or sold at 90% of their face value. Ontario Power Generation volunteered to retire 10% for a net environmental benefit. Energy efficiency help in the creation of emission credits is providing operating flexibility within the fossil fleet in a cost effective manner. The program created 1.9 billion kWh annually and almost 50% will lead to emission credits. As the emission program evolves and gains acceptance in the market, the energy efficiency projects are expected to increase to above 80%. The presentation provides details as to how the energy efficiency emission credits are derived and certified for use in the program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it