MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008754053 · doi:10.1080/13507480802082565

Space and belonging in modern Europe: citizenship(s) in localities, regions, and states

2008· article· en· W2008754053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Review of History Revue européenne d histoire · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPoliticsCharacter (mathematics)Norm (philosophy)HistoriographyState (computer science)Space (punctuation)Political scienceGender studiesSociologyPolitical economyLawLinguisticsPhilosophyMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Does citizenship exist beneath the level of the nation-state? An enduring historiography insists on the essentially national character of modern citizenship, but this article argues on the contrary that locally defined identities have continued to exercise an important influence on the social and political rights of citizens. These local identities are not just relics of composite states with different membership criteria; rather, spatially complex citizenship is the norm. Peut-on être citoyen au-dessous du niveau de l'Etat-nation? A l'encontre d'une historiographie durable qui insiste sur le caractère essentiellement national de la citoyenneté moderne, dans cet article on soutient que les identités définies au niveau des localités exercent toujours une influence importante sur les droits sociaux et politiques des citoyens. Ces identités locales ne sont point que les restes d'une ancienne conception de la citoyenneté. Du point de vue spatial, la citoyenneté est presque toujours complexe. Keywords: citizenship rightslocal variation ofadministrative uniformity and diversityregions in nation states Notes 1. Among the best recent examples for historical studies of citizenship laws are Patrick Weil Weil, Patrick. 2005. Qu'est-ce qu'un Français? Histoire de la nationalité française depuis la Révolution, 2nd ed, Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar], Qu'est-ce qu'un Français? and Dieter Gosewinkel Gosewinkel, Dieter. 2001. Einbürgern und Ausschließen: Die Nationalisierung der Staatsangehörigkeit vom Deutschen Bund bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [Google Scholar], Einbürgern und Ausschließen. 2. Groeber Groeber, Valentin. 2004. Der Schein der Person: Steckbrief, Ausweis und Kontrolle im Europa des Mittelalters, Munich: Beck. [Google Scholar], Der Schein der Person. 3. Sahlins Sahlins, Peter. 2004. Unnaturally French: Foreign Citizens in the Old Regime and After, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Unnaturally French. 4. As short-term care has usually been available to travellers in acute distress with little regard for their place of origin or ties to the community in which they found themselves, consideration of long-term access to material relief or medical treatment would seem to be the key indicator of access to social citizenship rights. 5. Marshall Marshall, T.H. 1950. “Citizenship and social class”. In Citizenship and Social Class and other Essays, 1–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], “Citizenship and social class,” 1–85. 6. Prak Prak, Maarten. 1997. Burghers into citizens: urban and national citizenship in the Netherlands during the revolutionary era (c. 1800). Theory and Society, 26: 403–20. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], “Burghers into citizens,” 403. 7. Sieyès Sieyès, Abbé. 1985. “Dire sur la question du veto royal”. In Ecrits politiques, Edited by: Zapperi, Roberto. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines. [Google Scholar], “Dire sur la question du veto royal,” 237. 8. Quoted by Forsyth Forsyth, Murray. 1987. Reason and Revolution: The Political Thought of the Abbé Sieyès, Leicester: Leicester University Press. [Google Scholar], Reason and Revolution, 152. 9. Sieyès Sieyès, E.-J. 2003. “What is the Third Estate?”. In Political Writings, Edited by: Sonenscher, Michael. Indianapolis: Hackett. [Google Scholar], “What is the Third Estate?”, 156. 10. Tilly Tilly, Charles. 1997. A primer on citizenship. Theory and Society, 26: 599–602. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], “A primer on citizenship,” 601. 11. Brubaker Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Citizenship and Nationhood, 42. 12. Esmein Esmein, A. 1921. Eléments de droit constitutionnel français et comparé, 2 vols. 7th ed Paris: Sirey. [Google Scholar], Eléments de droit constitutionnel, e.g. I, 318. 13. See, for example, Hazareesingh Hazareesingh, Sudhir, ed. 2002. The Jacobin Legacy in Modern France: Essays in Honour of Vincent Wright, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar], ed., Jacobin Legacy, especially the introduction, and Rosanvallon Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2004. Le Modèle politique français: la société civile contre le jacobinisme de 1789 à nos jours, Paris: Seuil. [Google Scholar], Le Modèle politique français. 14. Craiutu Craiutu, Aurelian. 2004. Liberalism under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires, Lanham, MD and Oxford: Lexington. [Google Scholar], Liberalism under Siege, ch. 5. 15. On Duguit, see Jones Jones, H.S. 1993. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], The French State in Question, ch. 6, and Laborde Laborde, Cécile. 1996. Pluralism, Syndicalism and Corporatism. Léon Duguit and the Crisis of the State. History of European Ideas, 22: 227–44. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], “Pluralism, Syndicalism and Corporatism.” 16. Kahan Kahan, Alan S. 2003. Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Political Culture of Limited Suffrage, Basingstoke: Palgrave. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe, 117. 17. Journal Officiel, 31 March 1874, Annexe 2320. 18. Archives Nationales C*II 611: Commission relative à l'examen des lois constitutionnelles, 13 January 1874. 19. For example Neuman Neuman, Gerald L. 1996. Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders and Fundamental Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Strangers to the Constitution, 70. 20. Hanham Hanham, Harold. 1969. The Nineteenth-Century Constitution, 1815–1914: Documents and Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], The Nineteenth-Century Constitution, 141. 21. See notably Biagini Biagini, Eugenio F. 1996. Citizenship and Community: Liberals, Radicals and Collective Identities in the British Isles 1865–1931, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Citizenship and Community, 1. 22. Cherwell, 11 June 2004. 23. Seager Seager, J. and Renwick, J.P. 1918. The Reform Act of 1918: Full Text, Annotated with Explanatory Notes, London: Liberal Publication Department. [Google Scholar], The Reform Act of 1918, 48; Disney Disney, John. 1812. A Practical Abridgement of Election Law: From the Issuing of the Writ to the Return, London: Clarke. [Google Scholar], A Practical Abridgement of Election Law, 71; Evans Evans, A.C. 1981. The political status of aliens in international law, municipal law and European Community law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 30: 20–41. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], “The political status of aliens,” 29–30. 24. Décret portant constitution des municipalités, du 14 décembre 1789,” reprinted in Aberdam et al. Aberdam, Serge, Serge, Bianchi, Robert, Demeude, Emile, Ducoudray, Bernard, Gainot, Maurice, Genty and Claudine, Wolikow. 2006. Voter, élir pendant la Révolution française 1789–1799. Guide pour la recherche, 2nd ed, Paris: Editions du CTHS. [Google Scholar], Voter, élir pendant la Révolution française, 153. 25. For a fuller treatment of the debate and its influence on practice, see Beck Beck, Hermann. 1995. The Origins of the Authoritarian Welfare State in Prussia: Conservatives, Bureaucracy, and the Social Question, 1815–70, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Origins; Komlosy Komlosy, Andrea. 2003. Grenze und ungleiche regionale Entwicklung: Binnenmarkt und Migration in der Habsburgermonarchie, Vienna: Promedia. [Google Scholar], Grenze; Hennock Hennock, E.P. 2007. The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar], Welfare State; Smith Smith, Timothy B. 2003. Creating the Welfare State in France, 1880–1940, Montreal: McGill Queen's. [Google Scholar], Creating the Welfare State; Gueslin Gueslin, André. 2005. Les gens de rien. Une histoire de la grande pauvreté dans la France du XXe siècle, Paris: Fayard. [Google Scholar], Les gens de rien; Nathans Nathans, Eli. 2004. The Politics of Citizenship in Germany: Ethnicity, Utility, and Nationalism, Oxford: Berg. [Google Scholar], The Politics of Citizenship. 26. Hatzfeld Hatzfeld, Henri. 1989. Du paupérisme à la sécurité sociale 1850–1940. Essai sur les origines de la Sécurité sociale en France, Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy. [Google Scholar], Du paupérisme à la sécurité sociale; Gueslin, Les gens de rien, 29–59. 27. Smith, Creating the Welfare State in France, esp. 86–90. 28. Weil, Qu'est-ce qu'un Français?, 26–37. 29. Kettner Kettner, James H. 1978. The Development of American Citizenship, 1608–1870, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. [Google Scholar], The Development of American Citizenship, 251. 30. Kershaw Kershaw, Ian. 1998. Hitler. 1889–1936: Hubris, London: Allen Lane. [Google Scholar], Hitler. 1889–1936, 238, 362. 31. Trevisiol Trevisiol, Oliver. 2006. Die Einbürgerungspraxis im Deutschen Reich 1871–1945, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [Google Scholar], Die Einbürgerungspraxis im Deutschen Reich; Fahrmeir Fahrmeir, Andreas. 2000. Citizens and Aliens: Foreigners and the Law in Britain and the German States, 1789–1870, New York: Berghahn. [Google Scholar], Citizens and Aliens, 63–99; Kolonovits Kolonovits, Dieter. 2003. “Rechtsfragen des Wiedererwerbs der österreichischen Staatsbürgerschaft durch Opfer des Nationalsozialismus (Vertriebene) nach österreichischem Staatsbürgerschaftsrecht”. In Staatsbürgerschaft und Vertreibung, 66–89. Munich: Oldenbourg. [Google Scholar], “Rechtsfragen des Wiedererwerbs der österreichischen Staatsbürgerschaft,” 66–89; Zedtwitz Zedtwitz, Hans Georg, ed. 1966. Staatsbürgerschaftsgesetz 1965, Vienna: Juridica. [Google Scholar], ed., Staatsbürgerschaftsgesetz 1965, 14f. and passim. The most prominent documentation of the assumption of the existence of a state citizenship in postwar West Germany is articles 6 and 7 of the Bavarian constitution. 32. Hagedorn Hagedorn, Heike. 2001. Wer darf Mitglied werden? Einbürgerungen in Deutschland und Frankreich im Vergleich, Opladen: Leske und Budrich. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Wer darf Mitglied werden?, 151–69; Weil, Qu'est-ce qu'un Français?, 271. 33. International Herald Tribune, August 26, 2003, 5. 34. See, for example, http://www.tagesschau.de/aktuell/meldungen/0,1185,OID4070242_REF1_NAV,00.html (accessed July 4, 2006). 35. Blitz Blitz, Roger. 10 November 2004. The Medieval Relic Ruling a Modern City. Financial Times, : 11 [Google Scholar], “The Medieval Relic Ruling a Modern City.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it