MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008776104 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2013.6831120

Pure asynchronous neighbor discovery algorithms in ad hoc networks using directional antennas

2013· article· en· W2008776104 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Tian, Rose Qingyang Hu, Yi Qian, Bo Rong, Bo Liu, Lin Gui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbor Discovery ProtocolComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationWireless ad hoc networkInitializationMobile ad hoc networkDistributed computingComputer networkAsynchronous systemVehicular ad hoc networkAlgorithmWirelessNetwork packetTelecommunicationsThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asynchronous system provides great performance improvement for wireless ad hoc networks, such as anti-jamming, collision reduction and device simplification. Nevertheless, new media access and routing protocols are required to assist the asynchronous system, e.g., a neighbor discovery algorithm, which is the first step in the initialization of wireless ad hoc networks. In the past few years, a number of algorithms have been proposed for neighbor discovery. However, most of them only consider synchronous system and cannot work efficiently in asynchronous system. In this paper, firstly, we propose an analytical model for an 1-way asynchronous system in wireless ad hoc networks with directional antennas. Then, we compare the time-slot consumption in asynchronous system to complete the neighbor discovery process with that in synchronous system. Finally, in order to improve the performance of the neighbor discovery process, we extend the 1-way asynchronous discovery algorithms to a 2-way asynchronous discovery algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first practical analytical model of 2-way asynchronous neighbor discovery algorithm with directional antennas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207