MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<b>Signal Averaging in Wolff‐Parkinson‐White Syndrome:</b> Evidence That Fractionated Activation Is Not Necessary for Body Surface High Frequency Potentials

2000· article· en· W2008777413 on OpenAlexaff
William Smith, Humberto Vidaillet, Seth J. Worley, Jeffrey K. Pollard, Lawrence D. German, David Mortara, Raymond E. Ideker

Bibliographic record

VenuePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineQRS complexCardiologyWPW SYNDROMEBody surfaceInternal medicineTachycardiaRhythmDelta waveElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is commonly assumed that the presence of high frequency components in body surface potentials implies that fractionated activation fronts, caused by heterogeneously viable tissue, are present in the heart. However, it is possible that non-fractionated activation fronts can also give rise to high frequency surface potentials and that the relative amount of high frequency power is related to the complexity of the activation sequence. In a test of this idea, averaged body surface potentials were recorded during the entire QRS complex of nine Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) patients in situations in which fractionated activation fronts should not have been present, but which represent increasing degrees of complexity of ventricular activation: (1) postoperative ectopic pacing from subepicardial wires placed during surgery, when a single coherent activation front was present throughout most of the QRS; (2) Preoperative preexcited rhythm, when a single coherent activation front was present for one portion of the QRS (the delta wave); and (3) postoperative normal rhythm, when two or more activation fronts were present in the ventricles throughout most of the QRS. For comparison, averaged body surface potentials were also analyzed during the last 40 ms of the QRS complex and the ST segment of 14 postinfarction patients with chronic ventricular tachycardia. In the patients with WPW syndrome, relatively high frequency content increased (attenuation -36.7 vs -27.2 vs -18.3 dB) and QRS width decreased (160.7 vs 125.9 vs 94.1 ms) significantly from paced to preoperative to postoperative beats. Significant high frequency content was present in all cases, showing that coherent activation fronts can give rise to high frequencies. Interestingly, the postoperative QRS of WPW patients contained a larger proportion of high frequency power than did the late potentials of the patients with ventricular tachycardia. Thus, while the presence of late fractionated body surface potentials may be a marker for ventricular tachycardia, these potentials by themselves do not necessarily signify that the underlying cardiac activation giving rise to these signals is fractionated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacing and Clinical ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207