MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008802361 · doi:10.1061/9780784413272.359

Experimental Characterization of Energy Output from a Model Geothermal Pile

2014· article· en· W2008802361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cory A. Kramer, Prasenjit Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileGeothermal energyHeat exchangerGeothermal gradientGeothermal heatingEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringThermal energyThermalGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geothermal piles are increasingly used around the world as an innovative and sustainable method of harvesting shallow geothermal energy. Energy harvested through this technique can be used to partially meet the heating and cooling energy demand for residential and commercial buildings. Despite the growing recognition of the benefits of geothermal piles, the complex heat exchange through these piles is not yet fully understood. This paper describes a series of thermal tests performed on an instrumented model heat exchanger pile installed in a standard F50 Ottawa sand bed. Temperature measurements were obtained at different locations within the soil, on the pile surface, on the tank boundary, and at the inlet and outlet points of the circulation tube. Recorded temperature data are used to obtain time-dependent heat exchange efficiency of the model pile. The thermal tests presented in this paper provide valuable data on the nature of heat exchange through geothermal piles and on the thermal response of soil in the vicinity of a heat exchanger pile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeo-Congress 2014 Technical PapersSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207