Experimental and Computational Investigation of Losses in a Circular to Oblong Diffusing Gas Turbine Transition Duct With Offset
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The installation of a gas turbine engine onto an aircraft often necessitates the use of complicated ducting for the inlet and exhaust from the engine nacelle. These ducts may involve shape transitions as well as significant redirection of the flow. The optimization of these ducts may reduce the performance losses typically incurred with inlet and exhaust ducting. This study examines the aerodynamic and performance characteristics of a specific duct geometry that is a combination of a transition duct and an s-shaped duct. The study is motivated by aircraft gas turbine exhaust design considerations including lower engine back pressure, reduced wing sooting, and the reduction of thermal fatigue issues with aircraft structures. Experimental and computational (CFD) techniques were used to investigate the internal flow structure and distortion losses. Swirl was introduced to determine the sensitivity of the duct to the rotating flow typical of a gas turbine. Cold flow testing was performed for a scale model of the duct and compared with results from a commercial 3D CFD code. Velocity profiles were well predicated but loses were underpredicted by the RNG-kε turbulence model. The study has shown the value of CFD for the prediction of general performance trends in the design of a practical engineering device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it