Double sublimation system to deposit molecules from solid organic compounds onto a cryogenic substrate: Thymine on solid argon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on the design, operation, and performance of a double sublimation system for the deposition of a submonolayer up to a few layers of a low-vapor pressure molecular solid compound onto a cryogenic substrate. The system consists of a primary oven (i.e., crucible type) to degas and first sublimate the compound onto the tip of a secondary oven (i.e., finger type), which is then used to transport the purified compound inside an analysis chamber and sublimate it just in front of the cryogenic substrate. The latter is kept at exactly the same position all the time, which is essential for experiments sensitive to target position. Besides, the negligible radiant heat transfer from the tip of the secondary oven allows operation in the presence of a cryogenic substrate consisting of an inert gas solid. The overall performance of the system is studied by EEL spectroscopy for thymine deposited onto a multilayer film of Ar used as an inert cryogenic substrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it