MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008838163 · doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.564405

A transcriptomic approach to identify genes associated with wood density in<i>Picea sitchensis</i>

2011· article· en· W2008838163 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick G. Stephenson, Nicole Harris, Joan Cottrell, Steven Ralph, Jöerg Bohlmann, Gail Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Forest Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilQueensland University of Technology
KeywordsLibrary scienceGeographyArchaeologyForestryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for trees for industrial application is growing steadily and not expected to plateau for at least two decades; consequently, the supply of wood must increase to meet this need. One method for increasing yield without compromising land requirements is to modify wood density. The current study uses a transcriptomic approach to identify the genes associated with wood density that are likely to be of value in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) breeding programmes. Following extensive wood density analysis from a Sitka field grown clonal trial, three detailed microarray studies were conducted to compare the transcriptome of cambium and xylem tissue from contrasting density clonal lines. Twenty-five genes exhibited differential expression, with up to 50-fold differences in expression observed, in at least two of the three microarray experiments, and this was verified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Identified genes included those involved in cell wall synthesis, transcriptional regulation and plant pathogen defence functional categories. A wide range of processes influence wood density, but this study has identified potential regulators in these pathways. Future studies can now use this information to understand natural variation in wood density, and manipulate the expression of these genes to improve timber quality and yield.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207