<i>The Cochrane Library</i> and Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists for Children with Asthma: An Overview of Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Asthma is a common childhood disease characterised by chronic inflammation of the airways. One treatment option is the class of medications known as the leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). The use of LTRA in combination with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) may improve asthma control by reducing mucus secretion, inflammation and bronchoconstriction via this alternate pathway. Objectives To synthesise the evidence currently in The Cochrane Library Database Of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) related to the question, ‘In children with symptomatic but stable asthma, does treatment with a LTRA as a primary or add‐on therapy to ICS improve objective measures of lung function and asthma symptom control, reduce exacerbations, and improve quality of life compared to standard care?’ Methods CDSR was searched using the term ‘asthma’ in the title for all systematic reviews examining anti‐leukotriene agents vs any other pharmacological agent for the treatment of asthma. Data were extracted and entered into tables; data were synthesised using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Results Three reviews were identified; however, only two reviews contained data in children. There was no significant difference in change in FEV1, number of missed school days, or the proportion of children requiring oral corticosteroid treatment, or proportion of children who experienced an asthma exacerbation requiring hospital admission among those randomised to LTRA vs ICS. The addition of LTRA treatment to ICS resulted in no significant difference in the change in FEV1 or morning PEFR, use of β2‐agonist rescue medication, proportion of children admitted to the hospital due to an asthma exacerbation, or quality of life. Authors' Conclusions Until further evidence is available for children, LTRAs should not be substituted for ICS as monotherapy and ICS should remain the first line therapy for children with asthma. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that anti‐leukotriene agents added to ICS therapy improves asthma control, steroid‐sparing effect, or improved quality of life. Future research should address the gaps in children, including those as young as 2 years of age. Copyright © 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The Cochrane Collaboration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.022 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".