Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Writing a general history of design is a challenge which has been approached in a number of ways over the years, from Adrian Forty’s episodic Objects of Desire (Pantheon Books, New York, 1986), to Alice Rawsthorn’s recent issue-oriented Hello World (Hamish Hamilton, London, 2013). Running to 500 crown quarto pages, The Story of Design is a lavishly illustrated book, which makes some ambitious claims towards comprehensiveness in both press release and back cover. Laid out in a clear and readable manner, it displays good quality paper and binding, a no-nonsense table of contents, and a two-column layout which balances text and image throughout in a varied and engaging manner. Almost every page is illustrated, ranging from quarter to double page spreads, and these illustrations form a lively visual discussion alongside and in dialogue with the text, particularly as they represent a selection of images beyond the obvious ‘beauty shots’ of products on white backgrounds. They include a number of drawings (such as engravings, technical, patent and catalogue drawings), and contemporary photographs and advertisements, as well as ancillary material such as ergonomic diagrams and original covers of influential books and magazines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it