MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008873449 · doi:10.1117/12.552005

Tunable etalons and other applications of multi-application low-voltage piezoelectric instrument control electronics (MALICE)

2004· article· en· W2008873449 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Alan Scott, Rodney Norman, Liping Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsElectronicsMaliceVoltageElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EMS have developed low voltage piezoelectric (LVPZT) tunable filters for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), and a wide field tunable Michelson for the Canadian Space Agency’s (CSA) Stratospheric Wind Interferometer For Transport studies (SWIFT) instrument. As a spin-off from this work, we have developed a prototype control system for ground-based interferometric optics using LVPZTs and capacitive displacement sensor feedback. The system is designed to control three channels in parallel with a measurement resolution target of <0.1 Å/√Hz, and thermal drift bandwidth limit of ~1 Hz over a dynamic motion range of ~8 μm. The prototype Multi-Application LVPZT Instrument Control Electronics (MALICE) system will be delivered in fall 2004 with a field-widened Michelson to perform observations of atmospheric wave phenomena at remote weather stations. We describe the performance of the MALICE prototype and its applications to astronomical imaging and remote sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFrench-language works237,207