RhoA/ROCK Signaling Regulates Chondrogenesis in a Context-dependent Manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of the cartilage template that precedes endochondral bone formation requires the condensation of mesenchymal cells and their subsequent differentiation to the chondrocytic lineage. We have previously shown that inhibition of the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway or actin dynamics enhances Sox9 mRNA expression, increases glycosaminoglycan production, and transforms cell shape to a spherical, chondrocyte-like morphology. However, we demonstrate here that in three-dimensional micromass cultures of mesenchymal cells, increased expression of Sox9 in response to these manipulations is not sufficient to induce the expression of established Sox9 target genes. This is illustrated by a decrease in the transcript levels of collagen II and aggrecan as well as reduced activity of a Sox9-responsive reporter gene in response to ROCK inhibition and cytochalasin D. We also demonstrate a decrease in mRNA levels of the transcriptional co-activators L-Sox5 and Sox6 upon ROCK inhibition and cytochalasin D. The decrease in Sox9 activity is likely partially due to reduced L-Sox5 and Sox6 levels but also to a delay in Sox9 phosphorylation following ROCK inhibition. In contrast, inhibition of the RhoA/ROCK pathway and cytochalasin D treatment in monolayer culture results in the enhancement of a number of markers of chondrogenesis such as Sox9 activity and collagen II and aggrecan transcripts levels. These data demonstrate that the effects of RhoA/ROCK signaling and actin polymerization inhibitors on chondrogenic gene expression are dependent on the cellular context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".