MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008915246 · doi:10.1136/gut.2011.239301.459

Adverse events associated with infliximab therapy in a large single centre UK cohort

2011· article· en· W2008915246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Sprakes, PJ Hamlin, Lorraine Warren, Dan Greer, Alexander C. Ford

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabConcomitantAdverse effectInternal medicineCohortSurgeryImmunosuppressionProspective cohort studyPediatricsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Long term safety data for biologic therapies in Crohn's disease (CD) is still emerging. A recent study has suggested that serious adverse events occur in 15% of patients receiving infliximab (IFX) therapy for CD, and more frequently in patients on concomitant immunosuppression. However, the TREAT registry observed no increased risk of adverse events with IFX, compared to other therapies. The authors assessed adverse events in patients who have received IFX therapy for CD at their referral centre. Methods All patients who receive IFX therapy for CD in our referral centre for CD were included on a prospective database. Data stored included sex, age at diagnosis, duration of disease, previous surgical history, smoking history and Montreal classification. Response and remission data are also prospectively recorded. Adverse events to infliximab are documented each time a patient attends for an infusion, or at the following clinic visit. Patients who were not receiving concomitant immunosuppression were premedicated with hydrocortisone at each infusion. Results In total, 3165 IFX infusions were administered to 210 patients (median of 24 (IQR 7–48) months), mean Harvey-Bradshaw index of 9. In total, 59 (28.1%) patients experienced adverse events to IFX. 23 patients had a reaction during the infusion, with 9 discontinuing therapy. 12 patients had hypersensitivity reactions and discontinued IFX. Seven patients discontinued IFX due to psoriatiform rashes. There were 14 (6.7%) opportunistic infections (including seven episodes of Varicella zoster reactivation, and one diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a Caucasian male who had received 3 years of maintenance therapy and had a normal chest x-ray pre-IFX), 3 infections required permanent discontinuation of IFX. There were 3 malignancies (1.4%) all discontinuing IFX. One was an adenocarcinoma in a peri-anal fistula tract. Examination under anaesthesia (EUA) and biopsy pre-IFX had been non-diagnostic, but EUA was repeated after non-response to IFX. One older diabetic patient developed a fatal spindle-cell tumour, and one patient in remission had an incidental finding of a renal cell carcinoma when disease was being reassessed by imaging prior to withdrawal of IFX. Overall, 34 (16.2%) patients discontinued IFX due to adverse events. 21 (35.6%) patients were receiving concomitant immunomodulator therapy at the time of the adverse event. There was no significant difference in adverse events when comparing episodic versus maintenance therapy (p=0.62). Conclusion IFX is safe and well tolerated with low numbers of adverse events, malignancies and mortality in our large single centre cohort of patients with severe active CD. Careful patient selection, pre-IFX screening and monitoring during therapy can optimise the risk benefit ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207