Minireview/Minisynthèse Prospect for functional eradication of the bacterial ring rot disease of potato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The feasibility of eradicating the bacterial ring rot disease of potato, caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus, must be evaluated in terms of current knowledge pertaining to pathogen ecology and disease epidemiology, as well as in consideration of developments in laboratory methods for pathogen detection, seed certification regulations and plant health legislation. For our purposes here, eradication should be understood in a functional sense as describing the apparent elimination of the disease without really knowing whether or not the causal bacterium still lurks somewhere in the crop production system. The potential for such eradication depends on the causal bacterium's capacity (or incapacity) to persist in the environment and the means by which vertical and horizontal transmission among potato production units can be controlled. Strict application of certification regulations and early detection of infected potato lots are essential not only to maintaining control of the ring rot disease but also underlie progress toward its functional eradication. For an eradication programme to be successful it must include three fundamental elements, namely, early detection, sanitation and prevention. Ultimately, however, the feasibility of achieving success will depend on economic factors and the commitment of the entire potato industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".