Molecular characterization and comparative localization of the mRNAs encoding two glutamic acid decarboxylases (GAD65 and GAD67) in the brain of the african lungfish, <i>Protopterus annectens</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existence of two distinct genes encoding two isoforms of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65 and GAD67) has been demonstrated in most vertebrate classes, yet little is known about their differential distributions and functions in the central nervous system in nonmammalian vertebrates. In the present study, we have partially sequenced the cDNAs encoding GAD65 and GAD67 in the lungfish Protopterus annectens and determined their relative distributions in the adult brain by in situ hybridization histochemistry. The expression patterns of the GAD65 and GAD67 mRNAs were globally similar; the highest expression levels being observed in the granular layer of the olfactory bulb, the pallium, the subpallium, the anterior preoptic area, the thalamus, the hindbrain central gray, and the rhombencephalic visceral areas. However, striking differential expression was noticed in several structures. Very high to high concentrations of GAD67 mRNA were seen in the dorsal and ventral aspects of the anterior olfactory nucleus, which is in marked contrast to the very low expression of GAD65 in this region. Similarly, high levels of GAD67 mRNA were observed in the intermediate and ventral parts of the medial pallium that were virtually devoid of GAD65 mRNA. In contrast, GAD65 mRNA was found in the periaqueductal gray that did not express GAD67 mRNA. The differential expression of GAD65 and GAD67 mRNAs in these regions of the lungfish CNS indicates that the two GAD isoforms can be differentially regulated and that they may have distinct physiological roles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".