MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008941487 · doi:10.1080/0194262x.2012.730465

Information Needs and Library Services for Doctoral Students and Postdoctoral Scholars at Georgia State University

2012· article· en· W2008941487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience & Technology Libraries · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb and Library Services
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterlibrary loanLibrary scienceFace (sociological concept)State (computer science)SociologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsComputer scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doctoral students and postdoctoral scholars who develop new ideas and discoveries are at the nucleus of university technology transfer programs. A survey was conducted to identify the information and library services needs of doctoral students and postdoctoral scholars in the sciences. Access to journals and databases, interlibrary loan, document delivery, e-books, extended borrowing privileges, and library space are important to this library constituency. This underserved library community needs better marketing of library resources and services through online and face-to-face orientations. Science librarians should consider using social networking channels such as Facebook, LinkedIn, and text messaging. It is recommended that library privileges for postdoctoral scholars be the same as those for doctoral students or faculty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.062
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it