Role of enteric glia in intestinal physiology: effects of the gliotoxin fluorocitrate on motor and secretory function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of enteric glia in gastrointestinal physiology remains largely unexplored. We examined the actions of the gliotoxin fluorocitrate (FC) on intestinal motility, secretion, and inflammation after assessing its efficacy and specificity in vitro. FC (100 microM) caused a significant decrease in the phosphorylation of the glucose analog 2-[N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diaz-4-yl)amino]-2-deoxyglucose in enteric glial cultures and a reduction in glial uptake of the fluorescent dipeptide Ala-Lys-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid in both the ileum and colon. Dipeptide uptake by resident murine macrophages or guinea pig myenteric neurons was unaffected by FC. Incubation of isolated guinea pig ileal segments with FC caused a specific and significant increase in glial expression of the phosphorylated form of ERK-1/2. Disruption of enteric glial function with FC in mice reduced small intestinal motility in vitro, including a significant decrease in basal tone and the amplitude of contractility in response to electrical field stimulation. Mice treated with 10 or 20 micromol/kg FC twice daily for 7 days demonstrated a concentration-dependent decrease in small intestinal transit. In contrast, no changes in colonic transit or ion transport in vitro were observed. There were no changes in glial or neuronal morphology, any signs of inflammation in the FC-treated mice, or any change in the number of myenteric nitric oxide synthase-expressing neurons. We conclude that FC treatment causes enteric glial dysfunction, without causing intestinal inflammation. Our data suggest that enteric glia are involved in the modulation of enteric neural circuits underlying the regulation of intestinal motility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".