MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008963504 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2015.1011247

Molecular dynamic studies of the solubility of sodium chloride: fast calculations using seed crystalline cluster probe

2015· article· en· W2008963504 on OpenAlexafffund
Heather Wiebe, Johan Louwersheimer, Noham Weinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser ValleySimon Fraser University
FundersWestern Canada Research GridUniversity of the Fraser Valley
KeywordsSolubilitySupersaturationMolecular dynamicsCluster (spacecraft)Saturation (graph theory)ChemistryAqueous solutionSodiumChemical physicsThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical predictions of solubility, typically accomplished by comparing the chemical potential of pure solid and solution, currently suffer from a lack of accuracy. We suggest an alternative method for predicting solubility based on molecular dynamics simulations of the behaviour of a small seed crystalline cluster probe in solutions of varying concentrations. The size dynamics of a properly chosen seed cluster that dissolves in unsaturated solutions and grows in size in supersaturated solutions is indicative of the saturation point. This approach is illustrated by its application to NaCl in water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207