MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008966031 · doi:10.3233/sav-2012-00746

Vibration Analysis of Thin Plates Resting on Pasternak Foundations by Element free Galerkin Method

2018· article· en· W2008966031 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Bahmyari, Mohammad Mahdi Banatehrani, Mohammad Ahmadi, Marzieh Bahmyari

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalerkin methodVibrationStructural engineeringFinite element methodElement (criminal law)MathematicsMathematical analysisEngineeringPhysicsAcousticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The element free Galerkin method is used to analyze free vibration of thin plates resting on Pasternak elastic foundations with all possible types of classical boundary conditions. Convergence of solution is studied by increasing number of nodes for different boundary conditions and foundation parameters. Upon comparison with available results in literature, it was found that the method converges very fast and has very good accuracy even with small number of nodes. Applicability of the method was shown by solving numerical examples with all possible combinations of boundary conditions and different values of foundation parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207