MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008973487 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.115308

Two-component approach for thermodynamic properties in diluted magnetic semiconductors

2002· article· en· W2008973487 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Malcolm P. Kennett, Mona Berciu, R. N. Bhatt

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsaac Newton Institute for Mathematical SciencesAspen Center for PhysicsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpinsMagnetizationComponent (thermodynamics)Magnetic semiconductorSemiconductorCoupling (piping)Interpretation (philosophy)HomogeneousCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsSimple (philosophy)Materials scienceSpecific heatMagnetic fieldPhysicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the feasibility of a simple description of Mn ions in III-V diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS's) in terms of two species (components), motivated by the expectation that the Mn-hole exchange couplings are widely distributed, especially for low Mn concentrations. We find, using distributions indicated by recent numerical mean field studies, that the thermodynamic properties (magnetization, susceptibility, and specific heat) cannot be fit by a single coupling as in a homogeneous model, but can be fit well by a two-component model with a temperature dependent number of ``strongly'' and ``weakly'' coupled spins. This suggests that a two-component description may be a minimal model for the interpretation of experimental measurements of thermodynamic quantities in III-V DMS systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207