MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009014192 · doi:10.2741/s401

The origin of ovarian cancers - hypotheses and controversies

2012· review· en· W2009014192 on OpenAlex
Nelly Auersperg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioscience-Scholar · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerous fluidFimbriaOvarian cancerBiologyAmpullaEpitheliumFallopian tubeMalignant transformationEpithelial ovarian cancerNeoplastic transformationCancer researchCancerPathologyMedicineCarcinogenesisAnatomyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovarian cancer is the prime cause of death from gynecological malignancies in the Western world. In spite of its importance, it is poorly understood and its prognosis remains poor. The most common and lethal of all ovarian cancer subtypes are the high grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs). A major problem in their clinical management is the current uncertainty about their cell type of origin, which limits means of early detection and prevention. It has not been resolved whether all HGSOCs originate in oviductal fimbriae or in ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). This review summarises evidence for these two hypotheses and considers the alternative possibility that HGSOCs may arise at both sites. This concept is based on the common embryonic origin of OSE and fimbriae in the coelomic epithelium and evidence of overlapping differentiation between these epithelia in the adult, which suggests incomplete commitment and pleuripotentiality. This hypothesis would account for OSE and fimbriae giving rise to identical carcinomas, and for their susceptibility to neoplastic transformation that is absent in the adjacent extraovarian serosa and oviductal ampulla.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it