MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009021518 · doi:10.4324/9781315131320-48

Clinical Psychology Training in Canada

2017· book-chapter· en· W2009021518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cathleen Mooney

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œClinical psychologist · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyTraining (meteorology)Applied psychologyMedical educationMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nine universities offer graduate training in clinical psychology. They are, showing degrees granted, training emphasis, and the centres providing supervised intern training. Nine universities are Dalhousie University, Laval University, University of Montreal, McGill University, University of Ottawa, University of Toronto, Queen&s;s University, University of Alberta, and University of British Columbia. Most respondents simply observed that the responsibilities generally assumed by clinical psychologists are the usual ones of psychodiagnosis, psychotherapy, research, and training. Memorial University of Newfoundland : "Psychologists in Newfoundland have always been given a free hand in assuming responsibilities. Legislation providing for the certification and registration of qualified psychologists exists in the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. The main purpose of the acts is to limit the use of the term "psychologist" to persons with specified academic and professional qualifications. The University of Western Ontario avers that relationships with psychiatry and medicine in that setting are cordial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.352
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œClinical psychologistSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207