MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009035836 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2007.892215

Real-Time Dynamic Voltage Loop Scheduling for Multi-Core Embedded Systems

2007· article· en· W2009035836 on OpenAlexaff
Zili Shao, Meng Wang, Ying Chen, Chun Jason Xue, Meikang Qiu, Laurence T. Yang, Edwin H.‐M. Sha

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic voltage scalingDynamic priority schedulingScheduling (production processes)Real-time computingEnergy consumptionVoltageParallel computingEmbedded systemEngineeringMathematical optimizationScheduleOperating systemElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this brief, we propose a novel real-time loop-scheduling technique to minimize energy consumption via dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) for applications with loops considering transition overhead. One algorithm, dynamic voltage loop scheduling (DVLS), is designed integrating with DVS. In DVLS, we repeatedly regroup a loop based on rotation scheduling and decrease the energy by DVS as much as possible within a timing constraint. We conduct the experiments on a set of digital signal processing benchmarks. The experimental results show that DVLS achieves big energy saving compared with the traditional time-performance-oriented scheduling algorithm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal ProcessingSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207