Conscience des affects et biais de mentalisation chez les enfants manifestant des plaintes somatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La somatisation réfère à la présence de symptômes physiques pour lesquels aucun diagnostic médical ne peut être émis et concerne environ 20 % des enfants issus de la population générale. Certains concepts (p. ex. alexithymie) et variables (p. ex. anxiété) ont fait l’objet d’études visant à mieux comprendre les facteurs psychologiques y étant liés. Cette étude cherche à explorer la contribution de la conscience des affects et des biais de mentalisation aux plaintes somatiques chez les enfants. Des questionnaires mesurant les plaintes somatiques, la conscience des affects, les biais de mentalisation et les comportements intériorisés et extériorisés ont été administrés à 112 enfants âgés de 8 à 12 ans et à leurs parents. Les résultats démontrent que la conscience des affects, les biais de mentalisation et l’anxiété prédisent significativement les plaintes somatiques. La recherche fournit des indications quant aux variables liées à l’apparition et au maintien de la somatisation chez les enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".