MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009062850 · doi:10.1089/omi.2009.0012

Biomarkers for Prediction of Bovine Respiratory Disease Outcome

2009· article· en· W2009062850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMinistry of Agriculture - SaskatchewanUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBovine respiratory diseaseHaptoglobinBiologyMetabolomicsDiseaseBiomarkerImmunologyInternal medicineMedicineBioinformaticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fatal bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is frequently the result of a primary viral and a secondary bacterial respiratory infection. In cattle, BRD causes more than half of feedlot deaths and has a major impact on financial losses in the cattle industry in North America. It is, therefore, very important to understand the mechanism of this complex disease process as well to predict and identify BRD susceptible cattle to enhance treatment efficacy. We recently established the value of using combinatorial omics approaches to identify candidate biomarkers associated with stress responses, a factor that can increase the severity of BRD. The objective of the present investigation was to experimentally recreate fatal BRD and to use a combinatorial analysis of proteomic, metabonomic, and elemental profiles in serum samples to determine if multimethod analysis of these biomarkers could predict disease outcome. The proteomic studies revealed that changes in the serum proteome were significant on day 4 postviral infection when compared to preinfection (day 0) serum samples. Proteomic studies identified a group of acute phase proteins (haptoglobin and apolipoprotein AI), which could be linked to a primary viral respiratory infection, but there was no significant association observed with fatal BRD. In contrast, metabonomic and elemental analyses identified candidate biomarkers for viral infection (glucose, LDL, valine, phosphorous, and iron) and disease outcome (lactate, glucose, iron). While multivariate analysis of proteomic and metabolite profiles did not discriminate between animals that survived or died postsynergic viral-bacterial infection by analyzing preinfection (day 0) serum samples, analysis of serum elemental profiles prior to infection was, however, predictive of BRD outcome. Furthermore, discriminant analyses of all three methodologies used to profile serum (collected on day 4 postviral but prior to bacterial infection) revealed differential trends between animals that survived or died following synergic viral-bacterial infection. Thus, a combinatorial approach using proteomic, metabonomic, and elemental analyses of serum samples revealed that multimethod analysis could discriminate between the complex biological responses to secondary bacterial respiratory infection and predict disease outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it