MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009091073 · doi:10.3137/ao.400102

Improved representation of sea‐ice processes in climate models

2002· article· en· W2009091073 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Oleg A. Saenko, Gregory M. Flato, Andrew J. Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersInternational Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
KeywordsSea iceParametrization (atmospheric modeling)HaloclineClimatologyClimate modelGeologyArctic ice packArcticForcing (mathematics)Sea ice thicknessEnvironmental scienceClimate changeOceanographySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The apparent sensitivity of high latitudes to climate perturbations has spurred the development of global climate model components with improved parametrizations of sea‐ice related processes. We focus on two of these. The first involves the ocean component in which we generalize a recently developed parametrization of brine rejection during sea‐ice formation for use in a multi‐category sea‐ice model (i.e., one that resolves the thickness distribution function). The parametrization employs initial subsurface mixing of brine‐enriched surface waters resulting from sea‐ice growth. It is implemented in the University of Victoria coupled model, and numerical experiments are performed to highlight the physical processes and feedbacks involved. It is shown that a better representation of brine rejection improves the simulation of intermediate and deep ocean waters. Over the Arctic Ocean it also improves the simulation of the warm Atlantic Layer and sharpens the halocline. The second part of this paper focuses on the sea‐ice component. We perform a series of stand‐alone sea‐ice model experiments comparing a recently developed multi‐layer energy‐conserving thermodynamic scheme with the simplified scheme used in many existing climate models. Experiments are done with and without the inclusion of dynamic processes (ice motion and deformation). Of particular interest is the impact of changes in the representation of dynamic and thermodynamic processes on the response of sea ice to climate perturbations. This is accomplished by comparing results obtained with present‐day and future climate forcing, the latter obtained from the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) coupled climate model. We find that the more sophisticated thermodynamic scheme increases the sensitivity of ice volume, but decreases the sensitivity of ice area. As in previous studies, the introduction of ice dynamics tends to reduce sensitivity relative to a thermodynamic‐only model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207