MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009098654 · doi:10.5539/ilr.v2n1p174

Eurozone Collective Action Clauses and Specialised Agencies of the United Nations as International Organisations: Do CACs Constitute an Expropriation under International Law?

2013· article· en· W2009098654 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marieclaire Colaiacomo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Regulation and Crises
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIssuerBondSovereigntyExpropriationTreatySovereign stateConventionPolitical scienceBusinessInternational lawLawInternational tradeInternational economicsEconomicsFinancePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In February 2012, Eurozone Member States signed a modified version of the Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). This convention provides, inter alia, for the mandatory inclusion of standardised and identical CACs in all new Eurozone sovereign bonds from 1 January 2013. A sub-committee of the Economic and Financial Committee on EU Sovereign Debt Markets developed and published the terms of mandatory CACs on 26 March 2012 (the “Model CAC”). As a result, from 1 January 2013, Eurozone sovereign bond issuers will be obliged to include the Model CAC in bonds with a maturity greater than one year, irrespective of their governing law. The Model CAC will apply to both international and domestic issue. CACs in future Eurozone sovereigns are beyond the will of the issuing State. Can this excuse countries from obligations arising from instruments such as the Convention of the Specialised Agencies of 1947?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ResearchSame topicGlobal Financial Regulation and CrisesFrench-language works237,207