Synthesis and Characterization of N<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>X−Fe Models of Iron-Containing Nitrile Hydratase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of iron complexes based on the pentadentate ligand 4,7-bis(2'-methyl-2'-mercaptopropyl)-1-thia-4,7-diazacyclononane), (bmmp-TASN)(2)(-), have been synthesized and characterized as models of iron-containing nitrile hydratase (NHase). The chloro derivative [(bmmp-TASN)Fe(III)Cl].0.5EtOH (1) contains a labile chloride which facilitates synthesis of related complexes via substitution reactions. Complex 1 is high-spin, g = 4.28. Addition of NEt(4)CN with 1 in CH(2)Cl(2) results in the cyanide ligated complex [(bmmp-TASN)Fe(III)CN] x 0.5EtOH (2), which shows a single intense nu(CN) band at 2083 cm(-)(1) in the IR region. Complex 2 is low-spin, g(1) = 2.31, g(2) = 2.16, and g(3) = 1.96. Under basic conditions complex 1 affords a mu-oxo bridged dimeric Fe(III) complex [(bmmp-TASN)Fe(III)](2)O (3), which shows an intense band at 799 cm(-)(1). Complex 3 was recrystallized from CH(2)Cl(2)/hexane solution in the triclinic space group P1, with a = 10.5486(15) A, b = 13.0612(19) A, c = 8.1852(12) A, alpha = 96.923(2) degrees, beta = 112.729(2) degrees, gamma = 81.048(2) degrees, and Z = 1. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the previously communicated iron-nitrosyl complex [(bmmp-TASN)Fe(III)(NO)][BPh(4)] (4) (Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1039-1041) reveal that the HOMO region is dominated by Fe-S bonding. Complexes 1-4 display irreversible or quasi-reversible reductions in the cyclic voltammograms. All of the iron complexes and the zinc derivative, (bmmp-TASN)Zn (5), display an irreversible oxidation. Complex 5 was crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/n with a = 9.5759(6) A, b = 20.9790(13) A, c = 10.7113(7) A, beta = 91.283(1) degrees, and Z = 4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".