Antiviral Activity of Transiently Expressed IFN-κ Is Cell-Associated
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most type I interferons (IFNs) are expressed by the majority of cell types in response to viral infection. In contrast, IFN-kappa has been reported to have a cellular distribution limited to keratinocytes and certain lymphoid cell populations. Recombinant expressed IFN-kappa has been shown previously to possess weak antiviral activity when directly compared with IFN-beta. In order to expand on the antiviral potential of IFN-kappa, we transiently transfected human cell lines to circumvent the need to purify recombinant proteins and to avoid the possible loss of biologic activity by the purification process. We evaluated the transcriptional signaling and antiviral activity of IFN-kappa in parallel with IFN-alpha2b with mammalian expression vectors to express each protein transiently. Both IFN-kappa and IFN-alpha2b exhibited comparable transcriptional and antiviral activities. However, in contrast to IFN-alpha2b transcriptional signaling and antiviral activity, IFN-kappa activity was not detectable in conditioned cell culture medium. Subsequent experiments revealed there was a direct relationship between IFN-kappa-expressing cells and antiviral activity. These results were confirmed in immunocytochemical studies. Furthermore, IFN-kappa exhibited cell-associated antiviral activity against a hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicon cell line. This novel IFN signaling strategy may represent an important distinct and divergent mechanism for limiting viral infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it