MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009197613 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.38.4.853

THE CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF Li-BEARING MINERALS WITH THE MILARITE-TYPE STRUCTURE: THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF END-MEMBER SOGDIANITE

2000· article· en· W2009197613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrystal structureCrystallographyChemistryCrystal chemistryBearing (navigation)MineralogyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of end-member sogdianite from the Dara-i-Pioz alkaline massif, northern Tajikistan, a 10.1240(3), c 14.3198(5) Å, V 1271.1(1) Å3, space group P6/mcc, Z = 2, has been refined to an R index of 2.0 % using 576 observed (|Fo |> 4sF) reflections collected with single-crystal diffractometer with MoKa X-radiation. Electron-microprobe analysis gives a composi-tion (Zr1.98 Hf002)S2.00 (K0.99 Na0.01)S1.00 Li2.97 Si12.01 O30. The sogdianite end-member has the typical structure of the double-ring silicates of the milarite structure-type: the A octahedron and T(2) tetrahedron are completely occupied by Zr and Li, and tetrava-lent Zr at the A site induces the lack of Na at the B site. The simplified chemical formula Zr2 K Li3 Si12 O30 corresponds to the ideal end-member formula of sogdianite (Zr,Ti4+,Fe3+,Al)2 (M,Na)2 K [Li3Si12O30] with Zr dominant at the A site and M (vacancy) dominant at the B site: Zr2 M2 K [Li3 Si12 O30].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it