MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009228526 · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181938890

Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography for an Intracavitary Left Ventricular Lipoma

2009· article· en· W2009228526 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Tanzola, René Allard, Andrew Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac tumors and thrombi
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleInteratrial septumTransthoracic echocardiogramTransesophageal echocardiogramThrombusCardiologyMitral valveInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingCardiopulmonary bypassRadiologyAtrial fibrillationLeft atrium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 50-yr-old woman was found to have a left ventricle (LV) mass diagnosed from a transthoracic echocardiogram that was ordered as part of the routine work-up. An electrocardiogram also showed T-wave abnormalities in the lateral leads. To better characterize the mass, a subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance image suggested that the mass was an LV myxoma with calcification. Concern about the potential for thrombus formation and embolism led to surgery being scheduled for resection of the mass. After induction of general anesthesia, an intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed. Midesophageal two-dimensional imaging confirmed the presence of a mass on the mid and apical anterior LV wall measuring 1.4 × 2.2 cm (Fig. 1, Video clip 1; please see video clip available at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org). The mass was echodense and homogenous with a well-defined border. It remained fixed to the LV with a broad-based attachment to the distal LV between the anterolateral papillary muscle and the septum. It did not seem to involve the mitral apparatus. LV function and outflow were not impaired. There was no associated thrombus nor were there any other masses in any other cardiac chamber or on any valve. There was no lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum. The patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and the mass was resected without complication. Postbypass TEE examination revealed no residual mass. LV function and wall motion appeared normal with the exception of a void in the anterior-apical LV wall at the resection site (Fig. 2, Video clip 2; please see video clip available at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org). This likely was related to modeling of the LV wall by the tumor as well as the concomitant resection of some of the myocardium underlying the mass. Histopathology revealed mature adipocytes which were covered by a fibrous layer, findings which are consistent with a LV lipoma.Figure 1.: The midesophageal two-chamber view shows the broad-based attachment of the mass to the anterior left ventricular wall. The mass measures 2.2 × 1.4 cm.Figure 2.: The postcardiopulmonary bypass midesophageal two-chamber view shows complete resection of the mass with a void in the anterior left ventricular wall at the resection site.Cardiac lipomas are a relatively uncommon benign primary tumor of the heart, with an incidence of 8.4% in 1 series of 533 patients with cardiac tumors.1 Others have described it as being the second most common primary tumor of the heart, with an incidence of up to 20% of primary benign tumors.2 However, these figures include both highly encapsulated solitary lipomas and the more common lipomatous hypertrophy of the atrial septum. After a search of the literature, it remains difficult to determine the exact incidence of the highly encapsulated variety of lipoma. It seems that true lipomas are a rare finding, with the LV location being quite uncommon.3,4 Lipomas occur in all age groups and in equal frequency in males and females. They may present on either the subepicardial or subendocardial surfaces of any cardiac chamber; they have also been described to occur intramurally. They are most commonly sessile, but peduculated lipomas have been described.4 As in this case, lipomas are generally asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. However, they can cause intracavitary mechanical obstruction or extrinsic compression depending on their location. Lipomas have also been reported to produce electrocardiogram changes, but no consistent findings have been described.5 The echocardiographic features of lipomas are fairly nonspecific, but they have been described to be immobile, well circumscribed, with a bright homogenous appearance.3 When a mass is discovered with TEE, the differential diagnosis of an LV mass includes thrombus, an infectious process, and tumor, as well as normal nonpathologic structures that may be mistaken for masses. Thrombi are the most common LV mass and usually are associated with LV regional wall dysfunction or aneurysms. As vegetations are usually valvular, endocarditis of the LV wall would be a rare, but not unprecedented, finding.6 LV tumors have a wide differential diagnosis including both primary and metastatic tumors. The most common benign adult cardiac tumors include myxoma, papillary fibroelastoma, and lipoma/lipomatous hypertrophy.2 Intraoperative TEE is indicated for the evaluation of the resection of cardiac tumors. TEE can confirm the location, determine the size and attachment of masses and may guide surgical resection. Excluding the possibility of tumors at other sites and the assessment of any hemodynamic consequences is also an important role of the prebypass TEE examination.7 The postresection TEE examination is useful for the assessment of ventricular function, the completeness of tumor resection, and the possibility of damage to adjacent structures. Although preoperative testing in this case led to the presumptive diagnosis of myxoma, the intraoperative TEE examination indicated that features of the mass were more consistent with a lipoma. The mass was fixed by a broad attachment to the LV wall, whereas myxomas are often attached by a stalk to the endocardial surface. The lipoma was more echodense and homogenous than classically described myxomas. Another indication that points away from the diagnosis of myxoma is the rare incidence of myxoma in the LV location. However, the echocardiographic diagnosis of a cardiac tumor remains difficult given the variability of tumor appearance and histopathologic characterization is necessary for definitive diagnosis. In summary, we have presented the relatively rare intraoperative TEE findings and characteristics of a LV lipoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicCardiac tumors and thrombiFrench-language works237,207