Effects of dietary or injected organic cations on larvalDrosophila melanogaster: Mortality and elimination of tetraethylammonium from the hemolymph
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study of larval Drosophila melanogaster examined the effects of injecting the prototypical organic cation tetraethylammonium (TEA) into the hemocoel or adding TEA and/or other organic cations to the diet. Mortality, hemolymph TEA levels, and Malpighian tubule TEA secretion rates were measured. The LD50 for dietary TEA was 158.4 mM and mortality increased if competitive inhibitors of organic cation transporters were also included in the diet. Mortality increased from 24% on TEA (100 mM) alone to 83 and 67% when the diet contained both TEA and quinidine (10 mM) or cimetidine (100 mM), respectively. TEA-selective microelectrode measurements indicated that hemolymph TEA concentration was approximately 3% of that in the diet for larvae maintained on TEA-enriched diet for 24 h. Malpighian tubules isolated from larvae exposed to dietary TEA excreted more TEA than did tubules from controls fed a TEA-free diet. However, the rate of decline of hemolymph TEA concentration following ingestion or injection of TEA into the hemocoel was greater than that explicable by rates of active transport by the gut and Malpighian tubules (MTs). We propose that TEA concentrations in the hemolymph are reduced not only by active transport across the MTs and gut, but also by diffusion into the gut. The latter pathway is particularly important when larvae previously maintained upon TEA-enriched diet are transferred to a TEA-free diet. The ingestion of TEA-free food not only clears the gut lumen, but also creates a TEA-free compartment into which TEA may passively diffuse from the hemolymph.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".