MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009234966 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2014.6939492

Day-ahead dispatch of PEV loads in a residential distribution system

2014· article· en· W2009234966 on OpenAlexaff
Nafeesa Mehboob, Claudio A. Cañizares, Catherine Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduleGridComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Reliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringCapacitorAutomotive engineeringPeak demandDemand responseVoltageElectricityEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expectation of increasing market share of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs), utilities expect to see a significant increase in energy demand and system peak as a result of PEVs recharging their batteries from the grid, if the charging is not controlled at the distribution system level. By making the grid “smarter”, utilities would be able to maximize utilization of existing assets and defer capital investments, while maintaining system security and reliability. The current research proposes a modeling framework for day-ahead dispatch and dynamic control of PEV loads as well as scheduling of taps and capacitors. The first step of the proposed work, which is presented in this paper, involves the development of a static Genetic Algorithm (GA)-based optimization model that determines the day-ahead schedule for PEV loads, taps and capacitors, with the base load and relevant PEV information provided as inputs to the model. In this case, the objective is to minimize the system peak, while satisfying the physical and operational limits of the distribution system, as a higher system peak translates into higher operational costs for the utility. The proposed approach is tested in an actual distribution feeder, demonstrating its feasibility for realistic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207