MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009252380 · doi:10.1159/000070667

Assessment of Decline in Health-Related Quality of Life among Angina-Free Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

2003· article· en· W2009252380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnginaMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Confidence intervalInternal medicineOdds ratioCardiologyCoronary artery bypass surgeryCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyRandomized controlled trialLogistic regressionArteryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery generally decreases symptoms and improves quality of life, but for those patients without angina, prolongation of life takes precedence. We used the SF-36 to assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients who were angina free prior to CABG compared to those reporting angina. METHODS: We combined data from two randomized trials of hemodynamic management during surgery. Prior to CABG, demographic, clinical and SF-36 data were obtained. Patients were reevaluated at a 6-month follow-up. Patients with a decline of > or =15 points from baseline to follow-up for individual SF-36 domains and >5 points for summary components were classified as having a decline. We used logistic regression models that controlled for baseline SF-36 score and other baseline characteristics to assess HRQOL decline with respect to angina status. RESULTS: Of 590 patients, 28% were angina free at baseline. A third of the patients angina free at baseline had a postoperative decline in physical function. Patients who were angina free at baseline were three times more likely to suffer a decline in physical function than those with angina (odds ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.86-5.82). This finding remained after addition of adverse outcomes to the model. Baseline angina status was not related to any other SF-36 domain or to physical or mental summary component scores. Major adverse outcomes did not differ between angina-free patients and those with angina. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of patients reporting a decline in physical function after CABG was greater in patients without angina preoperatively, even when adjusting for baseline score. Given the substantial risk of decreased physical functioning, employing interventions to maintain HRQOL in this population should be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it