MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009255207 · doi:10.7202/1024761ar

Le tourisme médical, une nouvelle façon de voyager

2014· article· fr· W2009255207 on OpenAlexaff
Loïck Menvielle, William Menvielle

Bibliographic record

VenueTéoros Revue de recherche en tourisme · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Même si ses racines remontent à l’antiquité, la dénomination « tourisme médical » est fort récente et désigne les patients désireux de se faire soigner à l’étranger à des prix abordables, profitant d’une expertise médicale et d’un décor différent de celui de leur quotidien pour leur convalescence. Le but de cet article est de présenter ce concept et d’analyser les facteurs qui le stimulent, de même que les activités de marketing-mix mises en place par les cliniques pour capter ces patients d’un « nouveau genre » et minimiser le risque perçu par ces derniers. Un regard sur l’avenir est aussi proposé en matière de couple produit-marché afin d’envisager les perspectives à développer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTéoros Revue de recherche en tourismeSame topicGlobal Healthcare and Medical TourismFrench-language works237,207