Optimization of Selected Chromatographic Responses Using a Designed Experiment at the Fine-Tuning Stage in Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the applicability of a designed experiment at the fine-tuning stage in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method development. Using acetaminophen, theophylline, and caffeine as model drugs, a 3(2) factorial design was used to optimize selected chromatographic responses. The effects of the ratio of water to acetonitrile (%v/v) in the mobile phase and mobile phase flow rate on the theoretical plate number of acetaminophen peak, capacity factor of acetaminophen, resolution of acetaminophen and theophylline peaks, and the time for the elution of last peak (run time) were determined. Polynomial equations were derived to evaluate the quantitative relationships between the experimental factors and responses. A solution space was found by overlaying contour plots. Results indicated that, once the mobile phase that provides reasonably good retention and resolution has been identified, the strategy of using a designed experiment is advantageous over the conventional one-factor-at-a time approach since it would enable the analyst to optimize important responses, including run time with a minimum number of experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".