The Advocate ophiolite mantle, Baie Verte, Newfoundland: regional correlations and evidence for metasomatismGeological Survey of Canada, Earth Sciences Sector, Contribution 20090211.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mantle rocks of the Advocate ophiolite near Flatwater Pond (Baie Verte, Newfoundland) are dominated by harzburgite tectonites, which are extensively converted to listvenite along the Baie Verte Road fault and represent a potential gold exploration target. Most Advocate harzburgites have forsteritic olivine (Fo90.5 to Fo93) and Cr-spinels, with Cr# (= 100Cr/(Cr + Al)) between 52 and 64 and Mg# (= 100Mg/(Mg + Fe2+)) between 56 and 68. These mineral chemical signatures, together with high whole-rock MgO (46%–48%), low Al2O3 (<1%), and TiO2 (<0.003%), imply the Advocate harzburgites are refractory residues after ca. 25%–35% melting. Cr-spinel compositions of Advocate mantle rocks overlap with Cr-spinels from the mantle rocks of the Point Rousse and Betts Cove ophiolites, with Mg# higher than those of Bay of Islands or Thetford Mines mantle Cr-spinels. Although refractory in terms of major elements and mineral chemistry, Advocate harzburgites contain high La–Ce–Pr–Pb–Nd–Sm–Zr contents suggestive of pervasive metasomatism. Similar geochemical signatures occur in all ophiolitic mantle rocks from the Baie Verte Peninsula examined so far. The enrichments are not consistent with supra-subduction zone syn-melting metasomatism as observed in other Appalachian ophiolites. The apparent absence of visible metasomatic channels in most outcrops suggests that metasomatism occurred before obduction by diffuse percolation, but the nature and origin of the metasomatic agent remain speculative. The similarities of mineral and whole-rock geochemistry imply that all mantle rocks from Baie Verte ophiolites are correlative and may represent remnants of a single obducted slab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".