MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009328162 · doi:10.1109/smc.2014.6973888

Multi-resolution fusion of DTCWT and DCT for shift invariant face recognition

2014· article· en· W2009328162 on OpenAlexaff
Madeena Sultana, Marina L. Gavrilova, Svetlana Yanushkevich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceDiscrete cosine transformPattern recognition (psychology)Complex wavelet transformFacial recognition systemComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Discriminative modelInvariant (physics)FusionSubspace topologyFeature extractionLinear discriminant analysisWavelet transformMathematicsComputer visionDiscrete wavelet transformWaveletImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel Multi-Resolution Fusion (MRF) of Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform (DTCWT) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is introduced in this paper. Shift invariant multi-scale feature set is obtained using 2D DTCWT. Subsequently, discriminant DCT coefficients are extracted to map the high dimensional features into low dimensional subspace. The resulting feature vector contains non-redundant discriminative information and is small in size. Therefore, the proposed face recognition technique exhibits computational efficiency, low storage requirement along with high recognition rate under varying shift conditions. It also provides robustness to expression and illumination change. The performance evaluation is accomplished on four standard face databases. Experimental results show significant performance improvement over existing well-established face recognition methods under varying conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207