Three-Dimensional Integrated Thermodynamic Simulation for Wing Anti-Icing System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermal flow in an aircraft wing leading-edge anti-icing system is a complicated physical phenomenon and remains a challenging research topic of modeling and analysis. We present a complete three-dimensional simulation of a wing segment including the piccolo-type thermal anti-icing bays inside the leading edge is presented. The Navier-Stokes analysis has been conducted for the integrated internal/external thermal flows with heat conductivity through the solid skin. The fully structured zones and boundary-layer meshing have reduced the total cell number and enhanced the near-wall impingement and the heat transfer analysis. Simulation results visually reveal the hot/cold flow interactions and heat conductivity through the fluid and solid zones. The calculated leading-edge surface temperature is compared with flight-test data of a similar configuration. The computational fluid dynamics model and its analysis under different flight conditions and configuration modifications provide a valuable assessment for wing anti-icing system research and development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it