The W148L substitution in the <i>Escherichia coli</i> ammonium channel AmtB increases flux and indicates that the substrate is an ion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Amt/Mep ammonium channels are trimers in which each monomer contains a long, narrow, hydrophobic pore. Whether the substrate conducted by these pores is NH(3) or NH(4)(+) remains controversial. Substitution of leucine for the highly conserved tryptophan 148 residue at the external opening to Escherichia coli AmtB pores allowed us to address this issue. A strain carrying AmtB(W148L) accumulates much larger amounts of both [(14)C]methylammonium and [(14)C]methylglutamine in a washed cell assay than a strain carrying wild-type AmtB. Accumulation of methylammonium occurs within seconds and appears to reflect channel conductance, whereas accumulation of methylglutamine, which depends on the ATP-dependent activity of glutamine synthetase, increases for many minutes. Concentration of methylammonium was most easily studied in strains that lack glutamine synthetase. It is eliminated by the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone and is approximately 10-fold higher in the strain carrying AmtB(W148L) than wild-type AmtB. The results indicate that AmtB allows accumulation of CH(3)NH(3)(+) ion in response to the electrical potential across the membrane and that the rate of flux through AmtB(W148L) is approximately 10 times faster than through wild-type AmtB. We infer that both mutant and wild-type proteins also carry NH(4)(+). Contrary to our previous views, we assess that E. coli AmtB does not differ from plant Amt proteins in this regard; both carry ions. We address the role of W148 in decreasing the activity and increasing the selectivity of AmtB and the implications of our findings with respect to the function of Rh proteins, the only known homologues of Amt/Mep proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".